1990 Buick Skylark vs. 2005 Ford E-150
To start off, 2005 Ford E-150 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1990 Buick Skylark. (110 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1990 Buick Skylark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford E-150 weights approximately 1188 kg more than 1990 Buick Skylark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford E-150 (373 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Buick Skylark. (183 Nm). This means 2005 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Buick Skylark.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Buick Skylark | 2005 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Skylark | E-150 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2471 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 183 Nm | 373 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 101.6 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76.2 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 2383 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 51 L | 132 L |