1990 Buick Skylark vs. 2010 Lexus RX
To start off, 2010 Lexus RX is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Buick Skylark. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Buick Skylark would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Lexus RX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus RX (295 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1990 Buick Skylark. (148 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus RX should accelerate faster than 1990 Buick Skylark. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus RX weights approximately 860 kg more than 1990 Buick Skylark. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Buick Skylark | 2010 Lexus RX | |
Make | Buick | Lexus |
Model | Skylark | RX |
Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2259 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1190 kg | 2050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4580 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1885 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2741 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 73 L |