1990 Cadillac Allante vs. 1966 Mercury Comet
To start off, 1990 Cadillac Allante is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Mercury Comet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Mercury Comet would be higher. At 4,087 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Cadillac Allante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Cadillac Allante (168 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1966 Mercury Comet. (118 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Cadillac Allante should accelerate faster than 1966 Mercury Comet.
Because 1966 Mercury Comet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Mercury Comet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Cadillac Allante, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Cadillac Allante | 1966 Mercury Comet | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercury |
Model | Allante | Comet |
Year Released | 1990 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4087 cc | 3279 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 168 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 103.1 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4550 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1880 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2950 mm |