1990 Cadillac Aurora vs. 1962 Ford Taunus
To start off, 1990 Cadillac Aurora is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Ford Taunus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Ford Taunus would be higher. At 4,465 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Cadillac Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Cadillac Aurora (200 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 162 more horse power than 1962 Ford Taunus. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Cadillac Aurora should accelerate faster than 1962 Ford Taunus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Cadillac Aurora weights approximately 743 kg more than 1962 Ford Taunus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Cadillac Aurora is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1962 Ford Taunus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Cadillac Aurora will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Cadillac Aurora | 1962 Ford Taunus | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Aurora | Taunus |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4465 cc | 1183 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 38 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 845 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4250 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2530 mm |
