1990 Cadillac Aurora vs. 1982 Mazda 929
To start off, 1990 Cadillac Aurora is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,465 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Cadillac Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Cadillac Aurora (200 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1982 Mazda 929. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Cadillac Aurora should accelerate faster than 1982 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Cadillac Aurora weights approximately 438 kg more than 1982 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Cadillac Aurora (366 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Mazda 929. (160 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1990 Cadillac Aurora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Cadillac Aurora | 1982 Mazda 929 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | Aurora | 929 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4465 cc | 1970 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 90 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 366 Nm | 160 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4710 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2620 mm |
