1990 Cadillac Aurora vs. 1983 Toyota Celica
To start off, 1990 Cadillac Aurora is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 4,465 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Cadillac Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Cadillac Aurora (200 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1983 Toyota Celica. (118 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Cadillac Aurora should accelerate faster than 1983 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Cadillac Aurora weights approximately 408 kg more than 1983 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Cadillac Aurora (366 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Toyota Celica. (215 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1990 Cadillac Aurora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Cadillac Aurora | 1983 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
Model | Aurora | Celica |
Year Released | 1990 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4465 cc | 2563 cc |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 366 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1320 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2640 mm |