1990 Cadillac Aurora vs. 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1990 Cadillac Aurora is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,465 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Cadillac Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Cadillac Aurora weights approximately 268 kg more than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1990 Cadillac Aurora is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Cadillac Aurora will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Cadillac Aurora | 1989 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Cadillac | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Aurora | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1989 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4465 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1588 kg | 1320 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4860 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2680 mm |
