1990 Cadillac Aurora vs. 2006 Mercury Mariner

To start off, 2006 Mercury Mariner is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Cadillac Aurora. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Cadillac Aurora would be higher. At 4,465 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Cadillac Aurora is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Cadillac Aurora (200 HP @ 4300 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2006 Mercury Mariner. (153 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Cadillac Aurora should accelerate faster than 2006 Mercury Mariner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercury Mariner weights approximately 337 kg more than 1990 Cadillac Aurora.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Cadillac Aurora (366 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mercury Mariner. (206 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1990 Cadillac Aurora will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mercury Mariner.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Cadillac Aurora 2006 Mercury Mariner
Make Cadillac Mercury
Model Aurora Mariner
Year Released 1990 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4465 cc 2262 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 200 HP 153 HP
Engine RPM 4300 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 366 Nm 206 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4250 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 9.7:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1588 kg 1925 kg
Vehicle Length 4860 mm 4450 mm
Vehicle Width 1890 mm 1790 mm
Vehicle Height 1410 mm 1780 mm
Wheelbase Size 2860 mm 2630 mm