1990 Cadillac DeVille vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 1990 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,467 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 965 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Cadillac DeVille, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Cadillac DeVille (325 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 278 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1990 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Cadillac DeVille | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Cadillac | Seat |
Model | DeVille | 600 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 4467 cc | 767 cc |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 325 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5160 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2820 mm | 2010 mm |