1990 Cadillac DeVille vs. 2000 Seat Arosa

To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 4,467 cc (8 cylinders), 1990 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Cadillac DeVille (153 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2000 Seat Arosa. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2000 Seat Arosa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 251 kg more than 2000 Seat Arosa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Cadillac DeVille (325 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 1990 Cadillac DeVille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa. 1990 Cadillac DeVille has automatic transmission and 2000 Seat Arosa has manual transmission. 2000 Seat Arosa will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1990 Cadillac DeVille will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: