1990 Chevrolet Astro vs. 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1990 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 569 kg more than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Because 1990 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Chevrolet Astro | 1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Astro | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4293 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1895 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4830 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1980 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |
