1990 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1996 Mazda Familia
To start off, 1996 Mazda Familia is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 3,133 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 420 kg more than 1996 Mazda Familia.
Because 1990 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Familia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chevrolet Camaro | 1996 Mazda Familia | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | Familia |
Year Released | 1990 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3133 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.3:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 50 L |