1990 Chevrolet Lumina vs. 1954 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1990 Chevrolet Lumina is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,474 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chevrolet Lumina is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chevrolet Lumina (108 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chevrolet Lumina should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chevrolet Lumina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1990 Chevrolet Lumina has automatic transmission and 1954 Ford 12 M has manual transmission. 1954 Ford 12 M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1990 Chevrolet Lumina will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chevrolet Lumina | 1954 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Lumina | 12 M |
Year Released | 1990 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2474 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5040 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2740 mm | 2500 mm |