1990 Chrysler ES vs. 1954 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1990 Chrysler ES is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 56 more horse power than 1954 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford 12 M.
Because 1954 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler ES | 1954 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ES | 12 M |
Year Released | 1990 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2500 mm |