1990 Chrysler ES vs. 1962 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1990 Chrysler ES is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1962 Toyota Corona. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1962 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Chrysler ES weights approximately 205 kg more than 1962 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Toyota Corona. (68 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1990 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Toyota Corona.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler ES | 1962 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | ES | Corona |
Year Released | 1990 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 68 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 65 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 22.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2410 mm |