1990 Chrysler ES vs. 1965 MG MGC
To start off, 1990 Chrysler ES is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1965 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler ES.
Because 1965 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1965 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1965 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler ES | 1965 MG MGC | |
Make | Chrysler | MG |
Model | ES | MGC |
Year Released | 1990 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2560 mm |