1990 Chrysler ES vs. 1976 Ford Falcon
To start off, 1990 Chrysler ES is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,092 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Ford Falcon (153 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Ford Falcon weights approximately 235 kg more than 1990 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Ford Falcon (325 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 159 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1976 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler ES | 1976 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | ES | Falcon |
Year Released | 1990 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4092 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2830 mm |