1990 Chrysler ES vs. 1982 Ford Telstar
To start off, 1990 Chrysler ES is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Telstar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Telstar would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Telstar (95 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Telstar should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Chrysler ES weights approximately 115 kg more than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Ford Telstar. (158 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1990 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Ford Telstar.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Chrysler ES | 1982 Ford Telstar | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | ES | Telstar |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 95 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 158 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1030 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4390 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2520 mm |
