1990 Chrysler ES vs. 1984 Toyota MR2
To start off, 1990 Chrysler ES is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Toyota MR2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Toyota MR2 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chrysler ES (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1984 Toyota MR2. (83 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1984 Toyota MR2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Chrysler ES weights approximately 185 kg more than 1984 Toyota MR2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1984 Toyota MR2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1984 Toyota MR2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Toyota MR2. (118 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1990 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Toyota MR2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Chrysler ES | 1984 Toyota MR2 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | ES | MR2 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1453 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 118 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 3930 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1260 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2330 mm |
