1990 Chrysler ES vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chrysler ES (93 HP) has 40 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Chrysler ES weights approximately 495 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Chrysler ES | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Chrysler | MCC |
| Model | ES | Smart |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1460 mm |
