1990 Chrysler ES vs. 2002 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 2002 Jaguar XJR is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Jaguar XJR (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 297 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Jaguar XJR should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 520 kg more than 1990 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Jaguar XJR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Jaguar XJR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Jaguar XJR (525 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 359 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Jaguar XJR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Chrysler ES | 2002 Jaguar XJR | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
| Model | ES | XJR |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 4196 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 525 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 90.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.1:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1665 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 5100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2910 mm |
