1990 Chrysler ES vs. 2008 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda RX-8 (108 HP @ 8200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda RX-8 should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler ES.
Because 2008 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1990 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Chrysler ES | 2008 Mazda RX-8 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
| Model | ES | RX-8 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1308 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 93 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 8200 RPM |
| Torque | 166 Nm | 140 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4440 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2710 mm |
