1990 Chrysler ES vs. 2009 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2009 Jaguar XF is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,720 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XF is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XF (204 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XF should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XF weights approximately 626 kg more than 1990 Chrysler ES. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jaguar XF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jaguar XF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler ES, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XF (435 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Chrysler ES. (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XF will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Chrysler ES.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler ES | 2009 Jaguar XF | |
Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
Model | ES | XF |
Year Released | 1990 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2720 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 435 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 81.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 17.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1771 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2920 mm |