1990 Chrysler ES vs. 2009 Mazda 3
To start off, 2009 Mazda 3 is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler ES. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler ES would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda 3 (104 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler ES. (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler ES. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Chrysler ES weights approximately 17 kg more than 2009 Mazda 3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chrysler ES (166 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Mazda 3. (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1990 Chrysler ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler ES | 2009 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | ES | 3 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1598 cc |
Horse Power | 93 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 166 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1145 kg | 1128 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2650 mm |