1990 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1952 Ford F
To start off, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford F. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford F would be higher.
Because 1952 Ford F is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford F. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler Le Baron | 1952 Ford F | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Le Baron | F |
Year Released | 1990 | 1952 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1880 mm |