1990 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1952 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1952 Hudson Hornet is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Hudson Hornet. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler Le Baron | 1952 Hudson Hornet | |
Make | Chrysler | Hudson |
Model | Le Baron | Hornet |
Year Released | 1990 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 4810 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 144 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2990 mm |