1990 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,344 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler Le Baron | 1976 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | Le Baron | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1990 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 3344 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 160 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2670 mm |