1990 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1983 Mazda RX-7
To start off, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 2,501 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1983 Mazda RX-7 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1983 Mazda RX-7. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler Le Baron | 1983 Mazda RX-7 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Le Baron | RX-7 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1983 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2501 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 105 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2430 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 65 L |