1990 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 1987 Zastava 750

To start off, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1987 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron should accelerate faster than 1987 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 810 kg more than 1987 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1987 Zastava 750 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Zastava 750. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron (223 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1987 Zastava 750. (56 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1990 Chrysler Le Baron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1987 Zastava 750.

Compare all specifications: