1990 Chrysler Le Baron vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler Le Baron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler Le Baron would be higher. At 2,972 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler Le Baron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron (139 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 2000 Seat Arosa. (123 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron should accelerate faster than 2000 Seat Arosa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Chrysler Le Baron weights approximately 161 kg more than 2000 Seat Arosa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chrysler Le Baron (223 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Seat Arosa. (117 Nm). This means 1990 Chrysler Le Baron will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Seat Arosa.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler Le Baron | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
Make | Chrysler | Seat |
Model | Le Baron | Arosa |
Year Released | 1990 | 2000 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2972 cc | 1359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 139 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 223 Nm | 117 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1289 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2850 mm |