1990 Chrysler TC vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1990 Chrysler TC is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chrysler TC (174 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (53 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Chrysler TC weights approximately 724 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chrysler TC (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 193 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (78 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1990 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler TC | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Chrysler | Zastava |
Model | TC | 102 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1115 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 78 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1474 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2160 mm |