1990 Chrysler TC vs. 1996 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO (195 HP) has 21 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler TC. (174 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi FTO should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler TC.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chrysler TC (271 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO. (202 Nm). This means 1990 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Chrysler TC | 1996 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | TC | FTO |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 195 HP |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 202 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1300 mm |
