1990 Chrysler TC vs. 2002 MG TF
To start off, 2002 MG TF is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chrysler TC (174 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2002 MG TF. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 2002 MG TF. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Chrysler TC weights approximately 354 kg more than 2002 MG TF. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 MG TF is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MG TF. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chrysler TC (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MG TF. (165 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1990 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MG TF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Chrysler TC | 2002 MG TF | |
| Make | Chrysler | MG |
| Model | TC | TF |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 80.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 89.3 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1474 kg | 1120 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1270 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2380 mm |
