1990 Chrysler TC vs. 2005 Kia K2700
To start off, 2005 Kia K2700 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,665 cc, 2005 Kia K2700 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chrysler TC (174 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2005 Kia K2700. (83 HP @ 4150 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia K2700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia K2700 weights approximately 56 kg more than 1990 Chrysler TC.
Because 2005 Kia K2700 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Kia K2700. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chrysler TC (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 95 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia K2700. (176 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1990 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia K2700.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler TC | 2005 Kia K2700 | |
Make | Chrysler | Kia |
Model | TC | K2700 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2005 |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 2665 cc |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4150 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 176 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 94.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 95 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1474 kg | 1530 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2380 mm |