1990 Chrysler TC vs. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT
To start off, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 5,406 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (300 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler TC. (174 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler TC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Lincoln Mark LT weights approximately 962 kg more than 1990 Chrysler TC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Lincoln Mark LT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1990 Chrysler TC. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Lincoln Mark LT (495 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Chrysler TC. (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2006 Lincoln Mark LT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Chrysler TC.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Chrysler TC | 2006 Lincoln Mark LT | |
| Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
| Model | TC | Mark LT |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2213 cc | 5406 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 174 HP | 300 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 495 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 90.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92 mm | 105.9 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 9.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1474 kg | 2436 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 2010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1870 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 3520 mm |
