1990 Chrysler TC vs. 2008 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2008 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Chrysler TC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Chrysler TC (174 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (108 HP @ 8200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler TC should accelerate faster than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2008 Mazda RX-8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2008 Mazda RX-8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Chrysler TC (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 131 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda RX-8. (140 Nm @ 5500 RPM). This means 1990 Chrysler TC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Chrysler TC | 2008 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | TC | RX-8 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2213 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 174 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 8200 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 140 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1750 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2710 mm |