1990 Chrysler TC vs. 2013 Ford E-Series

To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler TC would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (222 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler TC. (174 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler TC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 101 kg more than 1990 Chrysler TC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Ford E-Series is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford E-Series. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler TC, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (387 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 116 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Chrysler TC. (271 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Chrysler TC.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Chrysler TC 2013 Ford E-Series
Make Chrysler Ford
Model TC E-Series
Year Released 1990 2013
Body Type Convertible Van
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2213 cc 4605 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 174 HP 222 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4800 RPM
Torque 271 Nm 387 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.6 mm 90 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92 mm 90 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.1:1 9.38:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 25 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1474 kg 1575 kg
Vehicle Length 4470 mm 5504 mm
Vehicle Width 1750 mm 2017 mm
Vehicle Height 1320 mm 2085 mm
Wheelbase Size 2370 mm 3505 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]