1990 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire
To start off, 1990 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire would be higher. At 6,965 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire weights approximately 400 kg more than 1990 Chrysler Voyager.
Because 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Chrysler Voyager | 1965 Oldsmobile Starfire | |
| Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Voyager | Starfire |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 6965 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1420 kg | 1820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 3130 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 60 L |
