1990 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1990 Chrysler Voyager. (96 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1990 Chrysler Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Chrysler Voyager. (183 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Chrysler Voyager.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Chrysler Voyager | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Voyager | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1990 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2501 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 183 Nm | 184 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
| Vehicle Length | 4530 mm | 4437 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1806 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1680 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2619 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 57 L |
