1990 Citroen C 15 vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1990 Citroen C 15 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,010 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (335 HP) has 291 more horse power than 1990 Citroen C 15. (44 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1990 Citroen C 15.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Ford Mustang (597 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 527 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Citroen C 15. (70 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1968 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Citroen C 15 | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C 15 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1990 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 954 cc | 7010 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 44 HP | 335 HP |
Torque | 70 Nm | 597 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2750 mm |