1990 Citroen CX vs. 1996 Ford Royale
To start off, 1996 Ford Royale is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Citroen CX would be higher. At 1,985 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Citroen CX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Ford Royale (109 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1990 Citroen CX. (102 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Ford Royale should accelerate faster than 1990 Citroen CX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Citroen CX. (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1996 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Citroen CX | 1996 Ford Royale | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | CX | Royale |
Year Released | 1990 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 1984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 173 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2560 mm |