1990 Citroen CX vs. 2008 Mazda 5
To start off, 2008 Mazda 5 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Citroen CX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Citroen CX would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Mazda 5 (153 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1990 Citroen CX. (102 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1990 Citroen CX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Citroen CX weights approximately 50 kg more than 2008 Mazda 5.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Mazda 5 (201 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Citroen CX. (159 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2008 Mazda 5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Citroen CX.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Citroen CX | 2008 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | CX | 5 |
Year Released | 1990 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1985 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 102 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 159 Nm | 201 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4670 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.2 L/100km | 8.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 60 L |