1990 Citroen XM vs. 1972 Ford Custom
To start off, 1990 Citroen XM is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Ford Custom. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Ford Custom would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1972 Ford Custom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Ford Custom (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1990 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Ford Custom should accelerate faster than 1990 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Ford Custom weights approximately 489 kg more than 1990 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1972 Ford Custom is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1972 Ford Custom. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Ford Custom (325 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Citroen XM. (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1972 Ford Custom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Citroen XM. 1972 Ford Custom has automatic transmission and 1990 Citroen XM has manual transmission. 1990 Citroen XM will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1972 Ford Custom will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Citroen XM | 1972 Ford Custom | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | XM | Custom |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4942 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 325 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 101.6 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 76.2 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1769 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 5550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3080 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 83 L |
