1990 Citroen XM vs. 1995 Mazda MX-3

To start off, 1995 Mazda MX-3 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Citroen XM (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (106 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda MX-3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Citroen XM weights approximately 221 kg more than 1995 Mazda MX-3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1990 Citroen XM (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1990 Citroen XM will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda MX-3.

Compare all specifications:

1990 Citroen XM 1995 Mazda MX-3
Make Citroen Mazda
Model XM MX-3
Year Released 1990 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 115 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 6200 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 134 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 3600 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1280 kg 1059 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4230 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2460 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 65 L