1990 Citroen XM vs. 2004 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2004 Ford Ecosport is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Citroen XM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Citroen XM would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Citroen XM is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Citroen XM (115 HP) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Ford Ecosport. (94 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Citroen XM should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Citroen XM | 2004 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | XM | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1990 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 94 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2490 mm |