1990 Daihatsu Mira vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 1990 Daihatsu Mira is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,220 cc (4 cylinders), 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace (72 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1990 Daihatsu Mira. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace should accelerate faster than 1990 Daihatsu Mira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Daihatsu Mira weights approximately 255 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace.
Because 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Daihatsu Mira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Daihatsu Mira | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
Make | Daihatsu | Simca |
Model | Mira | Type 11 Monoplace |
Year Released | 1990 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 72 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3310 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2250 mm |