1990 Daihatsu Mira vs. 1981 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1990 Daihatsu Mira is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 2,210 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Mazda Cosmo (66 HP) has 4 more horse power than 1990 Daihatsu Mira. (62 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1990 Daihatsu Mira. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 520 kg more than 1990 Daihatsu Mira. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1981 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1981 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Daihatsu Mira, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Daihatsu Mira | 1981 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Daihatsu | Mazda |
Model | Mira | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1990 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 659 cc | 2210 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 62 HP | 66 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 675 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3310 mm | 4670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2180 mm | 2620 mm |