1990 Dodge Colt vs. 1964 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 1990 Dodge Colt is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1990 Dodge Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Dodge Colt (96 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1990 Dodge Colt should accelerate faster than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Dodge Colt weights approximately 695 kg more than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1990 Dodge Colt (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Suzuki Fronte. (33 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1990 Dodge Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 1990 Dodge Colt | 1964 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Dodge | Suzuki |
| Model | Colt | Fronte |
| Year Released | 1990 | 1964 |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 360 cc |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 153 Nm | 33 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1195 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2060 mm |
