1990 Dodge Colt vs. 1974 Volvo 140
To start off, 1990 Dodge Colt is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Volvo 140. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Volvo 140 would be higher. At 2,127 cc (4 cylinders), 1974 Volvo 140 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1974 Volvo 140 (123 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1990 Dodge Colt. (96 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1974 Volvo 140 should accelerate faster than 1990 Dodge Colt.
Because 1974 Volvo 140 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Volvo 140. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1990 Dodge Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1974 Volvo 140 (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Dodge Colt. (153 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1974 Volvo 140 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Dodge Colt | 1974 Volvo 140 | |
Make | Dodge | Volvo |
Model | Colt | 140 |
Year Released | 1990 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2127 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 96 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 153 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2620 mm |