1990 Dodge Colt vs. 1996 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1996 Lotus Elan is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,588 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Lotus Elan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Lotus Elan (163 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1990 Dodge Colt. (81 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Lotus Elan should accelerate faster than 1990 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Lotus Elan weights approximately 25 kg more than 1990 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Lotus Elan (204 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1990 Dodge Colt. (123 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Lotus Elan will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1990 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
1990 Dodge Colt | 1996 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Dodge | Lotus |
Model | Colt | Elan |
Year Released | 1990 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1468 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 123 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 995 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1240 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2400 mm | 2260 mm |